The NFL is consistently changing and innovating, which means that the formulas we use to make successful predictions must be continuously checked, rechecked, and updated. For predicting wide receiver success from college to the NFL, weight has historically been a very important variable. But do some current weight thresholds need updating? Let’s find out.

Estimated Read Time: 12 Minutes


  • Up until recently, ideally, highly-drafted wide receivers weighed 210+ lbs and had a BMI of 27+.
  • However, fewer and fewer of these types of players are entering the league, which means these thresholds may need to be revisited.
  • Wide receivers with a BMI under 27 are now scoring at elite levels, and the classes of 2021 and beyond are full of these kinds of players.

Are Elite Wide Receiver Prospects Getting Lighter?

On a purely anecdotal level, it appears as if the top wide receiver prospects are weighing in lighter than ever before. The days of the top wide receiver prospects weighing 210+ lbs with gigantic frames like Dez Bryant, Demaryius Thomas, DeAndre Hopkins, Mike Evans, and Mike Williams are becoming more rare.

We have previously used 210+ lbs. as a threshold for identifying the elite wide receiver prospects. This previous study also included wide receivers drafted in the first three rounds. However, considering only 11% of WR1 seasons since 2010 are from 3rd round picks (and of those, only Keenan Allen weighed 210+ lbs with the appropriate BMI), we are reducing the sample size to the top two rounds.

Are the top wide receiver prospects actually coming into the league lighter, or is it our imagination?

A graph showing the various weights of WRs drafted in the first two rounds

Not only are top wide receivers coming in lighter, but they are coming in significantly lighter. This difference is clearly more noticeable at the extremes with the recent decline of 210+ lb. receivers being drafted in the first two rounds, and the explosion of smaller receivers who weigh under 195 lbs. In the 10 drafts between 2010 and 2019, 22 receivers who weighed 195 lbs or under were drafted in the first two rounds. In the two drafts since then alone, that number is 17.

Accordingly, the amount of top 210+ lb. receivers drafted in the first two rounds (except for 2019) has been trending lower and lower since 2016. This is likely for a myriad of reasons (possibilities include health/longevity, a preference for lighter/faster/more versatile players, rules forcing defensive backs to be less physical, etc.) that won’t be analyzed in this article.

This has crescendoed in the past two seasons, where we have only seen 3/23 receivers drafted in the top-two rounds weigh over 210+ lbs. This is a change for NFL evaluation, considering that our previous threshold of 210+ lbs doesn’t seem to fit the recent trend in top prospect measurables.

Using BMI Instead Of Weight

However, weight is not the only measurement of size. If we are going to consider changing the threshold, we need to make sure that wide receivers are coming in lighter while still adjusting for height. Luckily, we can use body mass index (BMI) to measure weight in relation to height. As well as a 210+ lb. weight threshold, we have also previously used a BMI threshold of 27+ to identify elite wide receiver prospects.

Are wide receivers coming in lighter relative to their weight, or just smaller in general?

A graph tracking wide receiver BMIs in the NFL draft from 2010-2022

As the trendline shows, wide receivers are coming into the league smaller in relation to their height – not just in a vacuum.

Are Lighter Prospects Actually Producing?

So now, we’ve established that wide receivers are coming into the league far lighter than ever before and are weighing less in relation to their height. But we are missing one final piece of the puzzle: is this trend translating to the top-scoring wide receivers, or are the heavier, larger players still dominating despite making up a smaller percentage of the pool? We’ll start in 2011 this time to give those 2010 draftees the benefit of a sophomore breakout.

A chart showing the BMI of the top-scoring fantasy receivers over the past 11 seasons


Tracking top-scoring fantasy wide receivers by a 27 BMI threshold

Clearly, this trend is carrying over into top-end fantasy production. Considering that wide receivers peak around the ages of 26-27 and the explosion of lower BMI wide receivers at the top-end of recent drafts, the trend of smaller wideouts being able to score fantasy points at elite levels is likely not going away anytime soon.

What Does This Mean For 2022?

As the 2016 and 2017 rookie classes exit their primes, the stage is only further set for recent lighter wide receivers to be some of the top-scoring fantasy options for multiple years to come. What does this mean for the current young and “underweight” receivers with top-two-round draft capital?

You don’t need me to tell you to draft recent sub-27 BMI studs like CeeDee Lamb, Ja’Marr Chase, Tee Higgins, and Justin Jefferson. However, there are several young players with top-two round draft capital that may need to be moved slightly up draft boards when accounting for this new trend.

  • Marquise Brown has proven he can be very productive despite his diminutive stature (24.5 BMI) – with an aging receiver corps, departure of Christian Kirk, and suspension of DeAndre Hopkins, he’s in the WR2 conversation.
  • Jerry Jeudy (25.4) may be slightly undervalued (WR20, two spots behind Courtland Sutton) as the potential target leader for a Russell Wilson-led offense.
  • Van Jefferson (25.7) is certainly worth a stab at the end of drafts considering the lack of depth behind Cooper Kupp and whatever production Allen Robinson provides.
  • The arrival of Tyreek Hill may be the best possible thing for Jaylen Waddle (26.1), though his ADP of WR15 is probably already priced into his 2022 potential.
  • DeVonta Smith (23.7) is likely quite undervalued as the current WR34. He is a great sophomore breakout candidate and the acquisition of A.J. Brown is arguably an overall plus, considering the defensive attention he brings, the potential shift in offensive philosophy, and the price reduction it is giving Smith.
  • The Ravens, though they will look to pass less, wouldn’t have traded Marquise Brown if Rashod Bateman (25) wasn’t ready for WR1 duties. He’s a good sophomore breakout candidate as the WR25, though his ceiling may be capped by their offense and the presence of Mark Andrews.

As far as the 2022 rookie class is concerned, for now, we need to tread lightly when weighing BMI as a prospect variable. Only 5 of 13 of the top-two round prospects hit the 27 BMI threshold and we likely need to focus more on age-adjusted production and efficiency than pure weight as we gain clarity into this trend. It’s possible that prospect evaluation should shift away from overly prioritizing weight. Keep an eye out for our Mike Braude to soon release an article evaluating 2022 rookie wide receivers.

Looking Ahead To The 2023 NFL Draft

As these lighter prospects with excellent draft capital and production profiles (measurables that correlate most highly with wide receiver production) mature into their primes, this current BMI trend is likely to continue or even increase.

To confirm this, let’s look at the size of the top wide receiver prospects for the 2023 draft:

Player (School)HeightWeightBMI
Jaxon Smith-Njigba (OSU)6'0"197 lbs26.7
Cedric Tillman (UT)6'3"215 lbs26.9
Jordan Addison (USC)6'0"175 lbs23.7
Quentin Johnston (TCU)6'4"201 lbs24.4
Kayshon Boutte (LSU)6'0"200 lbs27.1
Josh Downs (UNC)5'10"171 lbs24.5
Jermaine Burton (ALA)6'0"200 lbs27.1

Again, we see the top wide receiver prospects coming in much lighter than a decade or even four years ago. This trend is clearly here to stay, until further notice.

This is only the first step in this weight-related research. In the future, We’ll explore just how we should adjust the thresholds we are looking for in elite wide receivers. It’s also possible we continue to place even heavier importance on age-adjusted college production (this older Rotoviz article may be worth revisiting) and draft capital.